Os meus resultados no teste que é proposto por O Insurgente (façam-no vocês também):
#1 You are a social democrat. Like other socialists, you believe in a more economically equal society - but you have jettisoned any belief in the idea of the planned economy. You believe in a mixed economy, where the state provides certain key services and where the productivity of the market is harnessed for the good of society as a whole. Many social democrats are hard to distinguish from social liberals, and they share a tolerant social outlook.
#2 You are an ecologist or green. You believe that the single greatest challenge of our time is the threat to our natural environment, and you feel that radical action must be taken to protect it - whether in the enlightened self-interest of humanity (in the tradition of 'shallow ecologism') or, more radically, from the perspective of the ecosystem as a whole, without treating humans as the central species (deep ecologism).
#3 You are a classical socialist, believing in equality of outcome as a principle. This might mean greater equality (e.g. Old Labour), or as close to absolute equality as possible. However, you will believe in an extensive public sector, covering not just public services (transport, healthcare etc.) but probably also the 'commanding heights' of industry (e.g. iron and steel). Your views on personal morality will be reasonably tolerant, in general, but there is considerable variation within this political group.
#4 You are a communist. You believe, at least in theory, in absolute equality of income - and you oppose the whole capitalist system per se. You want to abolish the market economy and replace it with one in which the workers (usually meaning the state) control the building blocks of the economy. Your views on personal morality will vary; traditional communists tended to be more authoritarian, while modern "eurocommunists" tend to take a liberal line.
#5 You adhere to the Third Way. The Third Way is a fairly nebulous concept, but it rests on the idea of combining economic efficiency - i.e. a market economy with some intervention - with social responsibility. The focus is emphatically on the community as a whole, and not necessarily equality per se. Adherents of the Third Way range from moderate to conservative in their social views, and have recently been willing to take a "tough" line on a range of social issues.
#6 You are an anarcho-communist, aiming for a society without the state, based on small, decentralised groups living communally.
#7 You are a fascist. You combine a strong belief in the nation with authoritarian social values, and a willingness to impose your views upon others. You strongly oppose immigration, and are willing to take radical action to combat it.
#8 You are a social liberal. Like all liberals, you believe in individual freedom as a central objective - but you believe that lack of economic opportunity, education, healthcare etc. can be just as damaging to liberty as can an oppressive state. As a result, social liberals are generally the most outspoken defenders of human rights and civil liberties, and combine this with support for a mixed economy, with an enabling state providing public services to ensure that people's social rights as well as their civil liberties are upheld.
#9 You are a Christian democrat - or, in the UK, a "One Nation conservative"; in other words, although you share the usual conservative belief in stability and duty, you believe that such duties include a responsibility on the part of the better-off to help those who are less fortunate. You will be socially conservative, but in favour of a mixed economy where the state does have a role in providing public services. Christian democracy arose after World War II, succeeding more doctrinaire Catholic parties dating from the 1870s.
#10 You are a libertarian conservative. You hold that the free market is the best way of organising economic activity, but you combine this with adherence to more traditional social values of authority and duty.
#11 You are a market liberal. You adhere to the traditional liberal belief in freedom, and take this to mean negative rather than positive freedom - i.e. a slimmed-down state is the best guarantor of freedom. You will therefore support a laissez-faire economic policy, and you will be reasonably tolerant on the social front - though less emphatically so than social liberals.
#12 You are an anarcho-capitalist. Anarcho-capitalists take the Jeffersonian belief that "that government is best which governs least", and extend it - "that government is best which governs not at all". The theory of anarcho-capitalism is that the market can replace the state as a regulator of individual behaviour (resulting in private courts, private policing etc.).
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2007
(1051)
-
▼
May
(102)
- O fim do trio-maravilha
- Um novo emblema para Lisboa
- 'That Guy'
- Jackson C. Frank
- Fogueteiro über alles
- Sei que fui por ali, no Parque Eduardo VII
- Margem Sul
- «Entre as brumas da memória» - Lançamento em Coimbra
- Lançamento: "O Fim do Mundo Está Próximo?"
- A greve preventiva
- O novo aeroporto e o poder local
- Os convites continuam...
- Algumas notas sobre a final
- Resolveu
- Todos à Feira do Livro
- Merecem
- Venho por este meio espojar-me humildemente aos sa...
- António Brotas: a Ota e a Câmara de Lisboa (II)
- António Brotas: a Ota e a Câmara de Lisboa (I)
- Sapo recomenda
- Homem caucasiano procura-se!
- That Summer Feeling
- Programas
- Trabalhos de sopro
- O ministro, a Ota ou como o autismo só pode criar ...
- Músicas do Mundo
- Pierre-Gilles de Gennes (1932-2007)
- NOVO !!! Gerador Automático de Discursos
- Algumas notas soltas sobre a final da Liga dos Cam...
- Blogue "Blasfémias" defende as conquistas da revol...
- Lisboa bem amada que mal me quis, que me quer bem
- A Transformação da Política
- Caoticidade do fluxo de Teichmüller
- Chomsky e pilinhas
- Bill Hicks - on smoking
- A dupla bitola da extrema-direita
- 21:05
- 20:56
- Intervalo
- 19:49
- 19:37
- 19:27
- 19:00
- 18:45
- Benfica decide
- Força Aves!
- As eleições para a Câmara de Lisboa
- Taça Xanax
- Formem filas ordeiras
- Leituras em lugares públicos ©
- O Sporting e a Câmara de Lisboa
- Tirou-me as palavras da boca...
- O lado negro da Escala Warhol
- Aposto que foi no Pingo Doce do Fogueteiro
- Dr. House: transmissão eminente
- O casamento do pobre
- Pedagogic measure
- Papel de Arroz
- A ópera do pobre
- Impressões Fotográficas de Buenos Aires
- O Estado como garante de maior democraticidade
- Cidadãos por Lisboa
- Cinco anos depois, soube bem voltar a ser líder
- Escala Warhol
- Se houver justiça desportiva...
- Um fado triste
- Drinking Blogger Award
- Stiff Upper Lippi
- Quatro medidas para o ensino superior
- O affaire Arroja (conclusão)
- A Vitória de Sarkozy e a Direita Portuguesa II
- Um Cenário Excessivo
- Uma cidade de William Wilsons
- Lusitânia hirsuta
- O affaire Arroja (2)
- CML - Um novo enfoque
- Lançamento - "Ardinas da mentira"
- Sobre as eleições francesas
- Roger has a plane ticket
- Vlad has a frown
- Proud in the possession of certain tools
- A Vitória de Sarkozy e a Direita Portuguesa
- A Dissidência da Terceira Via
- Smoke/don't smoke: a minha sentença
- Pós de Contra-Informação
- O affaire Arroja (I)
- "Não é verdade"
- It's Beginning To Look A Lot Like Fishmen
- Geekish tendencies
- Patos Bravos (bela síntese)
- Tartaruga melancólica
- Once Upon a Time in the West
- Mourinho
- Ainda o teste político - ideologias europeias
- Para Averiguar o Seu Grau de Liberalismo
- Filipe Moura, social-democrata?
- Uma providência cautelar contra a demagogia ?
- Resumo da minha jornada de protesto
- Inglês Técnico
- How to Hate the Working Classes
-
▼
May
(102)
No comments:
Post a Comment